SpaceX has already pivoted from mars to moon after so many deadlines. It was very much hype oriented.
Another point but datacenters in Space literally does not make science.
Even something like arctic/antartica might make sense, but beyond that the nordic countries and iceland makes even more sense from my understanding as they have proper infrastructure.
My main point is that, even it might be worth something, I am not saying 0 but it would be a very fractional amount of money if it isn't for the hype. They aren't that different in that regards. Both products work around generating hype.
These are gonna be extremely overvalued and the average citizen is going to be left holding the bags of both.
Wow, I had tried submitting the same video but you have beaten me to it! Upvoted, hope that this reaches the main discourse of the site.
Personally, I have been a john bogle/passive investing fan after reading some books about investing and I always thought that they were a nice aggregate but the corruption within the nasdaq and s&p to bypass their own laws or bend their laws for these private corporations is bad
I saw some comments in the video like: " As an existing private holder of SpaceX - heck yeah I want an IPO, brilliant exit opportunity. As a retail client - ain't no way I am gonna be left holding that bag, no thanks! "
Since Index funds investors are forced to buy things in Index funds, this is gonna be just an exit strategy for these private companies and we would be just left holding the bags
People within the comments are feeling like they have lost faith within the institutional markets (a bit myself included)
I feel like a bubble will come which will impact a lot of us as these IPO happens.
(this isn't financial advice), I will look more towards semi passive investing funds like dimensional, more than anything, it is to prevent grift like this from taking place. These private companies are essentially grifting the passive index fund and its investors.
I am really pissed at a lot of things right now, Corruption and hype seems to be the only two things people are caring about. I genuinely wonder what humanity will think looking back in these moments, It's a somewhat depressing thought.
John Bogle (rest in peace) would be extremely displeased by all of this if he was alive. The world might start losing faith within the institutional investments due to these events further increasing the gap between rich and poor and the people who lose from all of these would be normal people and that impact, even if not direct, will indirectly hurt the normal public the most rather than these billionaires who make money from these mechanisms.
I am not really familiar why a company might pay for an api though? Maybe for geolocation purposes but I am not familiar why someone might not want to do this client side or similar
No, this is actually nice to be honest. It's not a step backwards imo.
if I can incorporate Lisette into my golang projects for example, (Invoking rust code within Golang to me feels like a larger problem and Invoking C might be easier from my tinkering experiments) I feel like you are viewing this from a pure performance metric but to be honest, most things aren't necessary to be the fastest, the type system of rust/rust-alike languages can be beneficial to people as-it-is
Check out gleam, its based on erlang so it has a runtime involved, people love gleam because it gives them a bit more expressiveness in the type system from what I've heard.
I feel like these experiments are genuinely nice, Also perhaps a project like this can then slowly also invoke tinyGo (there was a recent discussion about it too) and could be compiled into tinyGo in future iterations to have no runtime essentially as well. People who love rust, love it, but most people really find it hard to get-into as compared to golang, I really love golang for its simplicity but I wish to tinker with rust too, so if Lisette combines both of these things and atleast makes me familiar with more rust without having to jump into too many hoops
As someone who is 17 (currently in high school/have just given its final exams :]), I think I have a few things to say, so comments like:
“It’s a modern gold rush", “If you wait until after you graduate,all the good ideas are going to be already taken.” and the last line of this article, “Would you rather tell your friends that your kid makes millions of dollars a month or has a college degree?”
I am just unsure how much of this frenzy is made out of essentially FOMO.
I can understand why someone my age might feel like all the ideas are within the AI space (or someone in general not even linked to my age) but, their comments just feel so hollow.
I don't believe that all ideas are within AI. I feel like personally what I do is prototype with ideas and wish to go to college so that I can really give my best in learning coding or just be the way I am right now really
I also sense a lot of the products might be really insecure the way they are written.
Another part but I also am not sure how I feel about these peers who are rushing into gold-rush and then being bound by these AI investors into these housing etc.
I live in my parent's house right now and use free AI to prototype. I am not sure but maybe its my line of thinking, but I would really love to not use VC funding unless the advantages of my idea[0] being with VC outweigh the downsides.
I also feel like if I want to work on something like my idea, I wish to be passionate, because if I am not passionate, then who else would be passionate for my ideas. I just don't feel the same amount of conviction from these peers.
I feel like passion is being sucked out of people and it isn't really all that good.
I don't know, I would like to try to do a bunch of ideas before I stick to an idea or an idea sticks to me. Having corporate interest be within this phase feels genuinely offsetting to me.
I might not be able to make money right now but I have decades of my life to make it. I'd much rather try to figure out who I am and what I like (this process is still very much ongoing)
But I get the lure of money, a lot of the world/people are just benchmarked with all of this in a more comparison oriented world. I am not sure about that as I sometimes wonder comparing myself with others with my marks or with my money, but being honest, I just want to make "enough" (that my parents are happy) and I just want to do some work which I can be proud of as a human. This lens of comparisons is a greater issue as well in my opinion.
Personally, the idea which has sticked with me right now is that I want to do something within the space of helping small to medium sized enterprises to better host within servers like Hetzner/OVH/others with open source products rather than using any subscription based product and making a living off from helping people migrate to open source and managing its security.
(Edit: also wanted to say thank you to anyone who has read this till the end, and also that, if someone who is reading this might have good relations with any college, I would really prefer if they can arrange an interview for me or anything where I can just talk to an individual who can hear me or give me a few markers within some good international colleges to apply to, I would really appreciate ,please feel free to mail me on this or just say hi to me on mail! I would appreciate both.)
can something of a cli utility be made which can deny any request from moving on, let's name this cli b which takes a user level configuration at say ~/.config or have a way to enter it via cli too or within the context of the folder which it is running in
then we can have "b az vm delete test123" be run via these agents but then b checks if az vm delete command itself is allowed or not, and if it finds that its denied then it gives an error: This command isn't allowed to run.
but if something like b az vm create test123 is done, then the command is allowed to run
Someone must have made an utility similar to b, perhaps someone can share the links of things like this, but what are your thoughts on something like this paul? I definitely feel like convenience can be wrapped around something like this rather than continue to use MCP protocol.
reply