hey author here, you're right, completely missed adding a permissive license. Just added an explicit MIT license with the latest version, thanks for bringing it up!
It's disappointing to see an expression of gratitude for the expeditious resolution of a licensing hiccup downvoted to -4. I'm left to speculate on why so many people responded by downvoting it as if it were spam.
Possibility 1: they are opposed to full automation?
Possibility 2: they don't think software licensing is a potential obstacle to full automation or sufficiently equitable access to the resulting abundance?
Possibility 3: they just have no idea what fully automated luxury gay space communism is, and lack the curiosity to look it up, and so they react without thinking?
Possibility 4: they hate luxury or gay people, so they object on principle to the vision of the future embodied in the phrase?
Possibility 5: they don't think human-factors improvements in software development environments rise to the level of importance implied by my thanks? (But if so, why are they reading this thread at all?)
I'm curious what could possibly motivate this kind of astoundingly hostile reaction.
