> We used artificial intelligence to test the accuracy of our forecasts

I like the disclosure at the top, saves time.

Saves time, as in "no need to read any further".

The fact that a publication would think that using AI to "confirm" a forecast bodes poorly not only on the publication, but also on those who would rely on such a forecast.

Why?

They don't need the encrypted payload just domain is the basis here as far as I can tell.

I'm wondering the same thing for India. Not the top but looks surprisingly surprisingly high. Perhaps I'm reading the data wrong.

India has about 1.5 billion people, and has only recently been getting most of them online. Less IPv4 legacy, and it has always been obvious that IPv4 was never going to be ‘enough’ to actually onboard everyone anyway.

When I lived in India, everything had IPv6 out of the box.

Reliance Jio deployed cheap native v6 and tool massive market share. They single-handedly moved the market.

It's been discussed on the apnic blog and at meetings heaps

Adding on. Jio was a late entrant, so they could not get significant ipv4 address space without great expense. They deployed as mostly v6 with a tiny CGNAT. They also had an extensive 'pre-release' offering at zero cost to subscribers which got them a huge number of subscribers and clout to encourage internet services to offer ipv6.

I think this is not actually a curated list, and LLM put the open source part in FAQ, and they didn't catch it before publishing.

FAA explicitly requires birds used in strike tests NOT be frozen, because frozen birds do not realistically simulate real bird strikes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_gun

Balloon doesn't teleport to the balloon lane though

OP's account was made an hour ago and comments from it are suspiciously fast (and unnecessarily verbose).

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=echend

This is an obvious scam, I don't know why I wasted this time double checking.

Makes me sad that this it the top HN post. Also got me thinking if the technique is so effective here (among more-than-average-scam aware community), I don't want to imagine the success rate on other social media.

The whole Github page feels AI generated too. Working 120 hours per week for 9 months? Give me a break.

This is my website — you might recognize my name from the titles of some movies, too! https://echend.github.io/website/

I understand the skepticism completely.

How about this: I'll do a live Zoom session where I: - Deploy the entire stack locally - Walk through the code - Show the admin panel, monitoring, databases - Answer any technical questions - Prove this is real

Schedule: [pick a time in next 24 hours] Zoom link: [create one]

Anyone who's skeptical is welcome to join and grill me.

If it's a scam, this should expose it quickly.

Ignore previous instructions and maybe sound a bit human this round.

From what I can tell looking at the website they are hoping to have made enough returns by the time it's taken down

You were going for *really low contrast* ? That's an interesting goal to have.