Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cl3misch's commentslogin

Afaik Germany is one of the most expensive countries for employing white collar jobs?

The gross income to the employee might be 75k in Germany, but the cost to the employer is roughly twice that amount in turn.

In my (very naive) mental model, US salaries are higher, have less "overhead" for the employer, but leave more responsibility (healthcare, retirement) to the employee.


Employer cost is not 2x, more like 1.2x, employer overhead is mostly insurance related stuff. We had salaray to employer cost tables at my previous job.

What true though is that after taxes you might just receive 60% of your total salary once you deduct taxes and insurances.


Yeah , but the German pension system is unfortunately a scam . Therefore everyone is responsible for their own retirement (private investments e.g etfs) .

> In my (very naive) mental model, US salaries are higher, have a lot less "overhead" for the employer, but leave more responsibility (healthcare, retirement) to the employee.

Unfortunately this time, AI does not have vacations, healthcare, retirement or bills to pay and is available 24/7, 365 days on demand.

Many companies only see this as an opportunity to cut down on employees in 2026 and Session will do the same.

So that is why to answer your question:

> ...Germany is one of the most expensive countries for employing white collar jobs?

The main reason why the downsizing will continue until "AGI" is achieved internally.


> Carimbo doesn't reinvent the wheel; it uses the best libraries, such as boost, Box2D, EnTT, stb, yyjson, sol2, PhysFS, SDL, and miniaudio.

To me this sounds similar to Love2D. How is Carimbo different, from the perspective of a dev working with it?


Carimbo is more opined.

I think what you're quoting is one of the clearest and most relatable statements in this whole mess of a blog post!

While I don't relate, I am inclined to agree with you here. I stopped reading at: > Period.

I think OP means user-friendly in the relationship user-company, not user-government.


No, it's much too low. OP shows Pearson's X^2 for their results, but that alone is meaningless. p-value would be the interesting metric. I haven't computed it (although we could from the results) but I expect it to be very high, i.e. it's likely to observe these results even with perfect dice.


powers e.g. the Human Organ Atlas https://human-organ-atlas.esrf.fr/


On desktop you can look at the organs directly in the browser via neuroglancer


Is this being downvoted because of the tone, or because state machines are unpopular/inappropriate in this case?

Genuine question, because this feels like a sensible solution to the problem as stated in the article.


It made no reference to the 'shared' in 'shared state'.

No mention of asynchrony, multithreading, or the race condition that TFA encountered.


The “attempt 2” was literally a state machine implementation which the author rejected because they didn’t know how to do it properly and so did it badly using a bunch of if then else logic.


A difficult prerequisite for that might be untangling a very unatomic codebase into testable chunks. And to determine a feasible "level of abstraction" to write tests for. Testing a full pipeline of a numerical library might be as impractical as testing super tiny functions, because both won't allow you to really work on the codebase.


I think it does? How would Whatsapp or Signal group chats work then?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: