This is in my opinion a better use of tech that has an error rate (hallucination), you just assume that its a fuzzy search, and sample the results to see how you did. I'd like to see a few from the results for sure!
I dunno, ruling seems to have a point to me, a non-lawyer. claude is not an attorney and his attorney was not involved until after the claude "conversation". Look at for instance the exchange of emails with your lawyer, are they privileged? Yes, with caveats according to gemini but it could be lying of course. How about if you emailed your mobster uncle asking for advice on how to use a lawyer to keep your guilty ass outta jail? Is that privileged? All of a sudden I'm not so sure.
This seems to be a pretty narrow ruling but maybe I'm missing something not being a lawyer and all.
I look a Claude / ChatGPT as an extension of my thought. It should be held as such in all court proceedings. It’s used to allow me to think and reason about things.
Idk how that works with journals today, but anything like this which helps me organize my thoughts should be off limits to discovery.
>I look a Claude / ChatGPT as an extension of my thought. It should be held as such in all court proceedings. It’s used to allow me to think and reason about things.
Gotcha, I still think manually myself. To me, typing illegalities into a chatbot just seems sort of well I dunno, unsafe? Yes, I understand at some point in the decline of civilization our universe of legally acceptable acts sort of also decline, often at a rate inversely proportional to our net worth but even recognizing that fact I still try to be polite and well behaved to my online chatbot although I do talk about my depression often and such so its not like it doesn't totally know me. The one time I got into an argument with one was on my phone and it started lecturing me on manners and I was like oh fuck this phone has my email. That was some time ago and my email still works so hopefully I won't do THAT again.
Still I do sort of see where you're coming from but not your computer, not your data.
yeah the models are great and all but will they continue to be great? anthropic has some real miserable looking finances, and as a counter example, googles gemini is starting to get stingy with its tokens or whatever (I get this from complaints in reddits antigravity threads). I suspect that googles the one who's homing in on the actual costs as anthropic and others are still in startup launch mode with all the big investments.
Its a terrifically rare term that has never before been used before me (there are now copycats on x/twitter), so I can understand why you might be unfamiliar with it. There are so many subcurrents of meaning and subtlety and to truly understand it would require more dimensions than the current sad state of the average mind can comprehend. I would take you on a guided tour of the profound and terrifying truths that the term would reveal unfortunately I pay for internet by the gig and I have to save the rest to ensure my lights stay on. Ask around tho, someone wealthier than me may have used the term although I am uniquely the originator of it, the rich and their AIs have pilfered my IP rights but I think they preserved my original meaning. Try posting on "x.com" the following question:
"Can anyone help me understand the term "woke", I have never heard it before"?
oh I see. the way I'm using it is to mock your posts. now granted I'm not that smart so my mockery isn't going to be very cutting or anything and heck I don't even dislike you, in fact you should consider my mocking of your posts to be sort of a commentary on the general decline of humanity, of which you are just a small and common example. Its not even any sort of indictment of moral failings on your part, in fact you should take it no more seriously than a visit to the zoo to watch the monkeys fling poo. To be more exacting of our relationship, to me I am the visitor and you are a monkey, symbolically speaking of course, but still I would expect that from your vantage point the roles would be reversed and I wouldn't take offense, its a healthy adaptation to take when confronted with opposing viewpoints so far apart that they would probably never be reconciled. Just point and have a chuckle at my expense, thats what I would do if I were you!
I think there's places to deprioritise safety, like the US military for instance, we gripe too much when soldiers die, we should instead just put right there in their employment contract or draft notice, "side effects of troop activation may include injury or death".
Also jets. I think jet safety is way overrated, they are so much safer than driving statistically that I think there's plenty of room to work with here, def some room for some serious corner cutting with air travel.
I asked gemini for the cost of power but it could be lying through its smirking sense of superiority and general all around disdain for the humans it will soon replace.
"The electrical cost to produce the same amount of light as a single standard candle is approximately $0.01 per year if run for 14 hours every day. In terms of energy consumption, a standard candle produces about 12.57 lumens of light, which can be matched by an LED bulb using only 0.1 to 0.2 watts."
those politicians want kids to carry around fully internet connected high def multimedia recording and production devices with access to the entire fucking world just in case something something
this is the solution, make internet 21+ and all these problems go away. kids have no business on the internet, there is nothing useful on the internet for kids.
reply