Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | glitchcrab's commentslogin


No, it is sandboxed by Bubblewrap on Linux and Seatbelt on Mac

The 240 is built like a brick (both in terms of strength and looks). My dad had one when I was much younger, then he sold it for a 740. A few months after the sales, police knocked on his door and asked him a lot of questions. It turned out the purchaser had used the car in a ram-raid on a shop.

Oh yeah I believe it. This thing is super strong.

I would be very surprised if it was that simple - systems in modern cars are so interlinked that I would expect that pulling a fuse would cause something else to break, resulting in dash lights or broken functionality.

In my car it's on the same circuit as the infotainment system which does kinda make sense but also, damn them.

> it's on the same circuit as the infotainment system

isn't it not-funny that the super-invasive Google profiling and ID checks are also part of "Google Play" ?


It's possible to find workarounds for things like this. One example: https://www.autoharnesshouse.com/69018.html

It's not even the AI prose which is the problem (although I detest it too); it's the lack of respect for the reader. I've started employing 'AI;DR' - if someone wants my (limited) time then they should earn it by writing themselves.


There's two level crossings alone in my small UK town (~150k people)


Could not agree more on the political side of things. I don't buy Dyson products on principle.


Anyone who gives an LLM unfettered access to their ssh keys/agent socket deserves what they get IMO. I sandbox Claude with my own bubblewrap-based script which denies it access to anything I deem unnecessary.


There's many ways to shoot yourself into the foot, most things that run in your userspace can do evil things and it's not an LLM exclusive feature. Any npm package you install on your machine can put you in danger already if it executes some scripts.


Quite, it's the volume water and the speed of release which matter, nothing else.


As a studying geologist, I find such a simplistic reduction to be very absurd, there are many factors which influence how that released energy causes its damage. Are there physical impediments in the way? Are there breaks in the path of flow? Is the environment already used to this amount of water flowing through it suddenly (the evidence of life everywhere says no so no surprise a ton of life gets lost when it suddenly blows through.)

Such a simplistic reduction also does serious disservice to the structural geologists, soil analyst techs, and others in the geological profession whose work focuses on preventing exactly this sort of situation. It's more complex than "Volume and speed."


> there are many factors which influence how that released energy causes its damage. Are there physical impediments in the way? Are there breaks in the path of flow? Is the environment already used to this amount of water flowing through it suddenly

and nothing of what you listed is "how long this particular water volume stayed in its particular location before starting to move" (because energy is energy)

don't lose context of what is complained about, dude.


Some of the prices are crazy too. I wanted 4 tenting legs for my keyboard, found some on Etsy for £100 total (no joke). 4 of the exact same item from AliExpress cost me about £4 including shipping.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: