Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jamescrowley's commentslogin

Ah but the problem is humans, not the AI! Best get rid of those ASAP.

/s


Or getting mad at oil & gas companies? They’re only supplying the fossil drugs we demand. And using their billions in profits to lobby at every level of government and society to ensure they can continue despite the scientific evidence of harm that they’ve known since the 70s? Not at all like that.

https://www.investigate-europe.eu/posts/big-tech-data-centre...

https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-choose-ai-climate-goa...


Quite a few countries (France, Spain, Italy for starters) require seat reservations in advance for any long-distance/high-speed trains now. And worse, they have a quota for passes, so even if the train has space, you might not be able to reserve a seat and therefore get on the train. A real shame as it makes it far less flexible than before.


For France, Spain, and Italy, only the inter-country and the high speed rails (TGV, Renfe, Iryo, Frecciarossa etc) require reservation?

In Switzerland, some of the touristy intra-country routes (ex: Tirano-Chur, Interlaken-Lucerne) may require (a rather expensive) reservation.


For Switzerland, that's only true for the special tourist train panoramic carriages on the route, there are normal trains running on the same routes, too, that don't require reservations.


In France, some destinations are served only by TGV. In Italy, taking local trains can take an eternity.


but with interrail the "useful" thing was to travel overnight, because that saves you one night of $$ for loding, so slow is actually fine.

I don't think fast trains (TGV, Frecciarossa etc) were ever covered by the interrail ticket anyway, were they?


They are covered, but you need a surcharge or a seat reservation, or both.


The EFI partition is unencrypted.

“you don't even need to plug an external storage device, you can just pull out the disk, copy the files in the EFI partition, put it back and it will still work. That's how bad it is.”


‘More power than an entire state’. Yep - take the Stratos data center project in Utah, the first phase of which is expected to consume 3GW and at full capacity is expected to be 9GW. By comparison, the entire state of Utah currently uses about 4GW.


For a less rural example, I am finding different numbers, but all of New York City is estimated at somewhere between 5-10GW. So, some 9 million people vs one data center.


Some significant fraction of that NY number will already be data center.


There's a little evidence that project is real, it looks a lot more like a pie in the sky dream.


3GW per what? Hour? Year? Minute?


Watt is Joule/second

3 gigajoule per second. It already has a unit of time.


3GW/9GW is peak load, as I understand it - data centres usually operate at 85-90% of peak load according to Goldman Sachs.

Meanwhile, the 4GW figure is average demand - Utah consumed 35,075GWh for 2025, so average demand of 4GW (35075/(365*24)).


3GWh/h.


My understanding is that is why they are limiting to 800w (~4A) at least in the UK's BS 7671 Amendment, which they consider well within the designed safety margins.


Hopefully nobody thinks "I'll save even more if I get two!" and plugs them both into the same circuit.

Perhaps they could somehow detect each other and shut off.


I think that's the reason why the total allowed panel power is only 800W, any more than that and you have to get it properly installed. At least that's ~ the way it is in Austria, it's also pretty easy to check whether you have ~800 or way more hanging on off your balcony.


Ah yes, the good old "let's eat into the safety margins". This is why our motorways no longer have hard shoulders. OK, so cars break down less now. What justification is there for eating into electrical margins? The wiring in people's houses isn't getting any younger. And we still use the ridiculous ring system even in new builds in 2026.


Estimates suggest they could save U.S. consumers billions of dollars a year in electricity costs, while potentially offsetting thousands of megawatts of demand (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S09601...)

Plus it increases equity because this primarily opens up solar for those in rented accommodation and apartments/flats who otherwise couldn't access it. Personally that feels well worth pursuing if it's deemed safe.


Great, but electricity is really quite dangerous and eating into the safety margins seems very short sighted. I've seen all kinds of horrors in home wiring. This might seem fine in a world where all wiring is completely up to standard, but in the real world it's done by busy electricians or clueless DIYers. The safety margins are there because in a real installation something will probably be not quite right. It's very common to find wires buried in insulation (the insulation installers don't know or care about electricity), wrong size breakers in use, old/worn out breakers/RCDs, loose connections, the list goes on...


Unfortunately most people's actual usage patterns for plug-in hybrids appear to make them worse than just a straight up ICE - https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/oct/16/plug-in-...


How exactly? Meta isn’t doing this out of generosity to society. They’ll be consuming this and vastly more energy to ultimately increase their own profits?


They were being sarcastic.


You actually don’t need (long-lived / hard-coded) secrets in this scenario if you use OIDC:

https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/secure-your-work/...


Technically yes. It depends on whether you consider the account ID to be a secret or not (AWS say "sensitive but not secret" which doesn't help much). But also it can make sense to treat all environment variables as secrets by default just so you don't accidentally end up putting something somewhere that turns out to have been Wrong.


GP is saying that GHA would need zero information about AWS if CodeBuild used a Github token and listened for GHA runs.


That may be true, but it's not what the link describes.


Fair!


And even better can scope assuming an AWS IAM role to a specific branch name & workflow filename so only code/workflows that have been through review have access to CD secrets/prod infra.

IE no prod access by editing the workflow definition and pushing it to a branch.


I wonder if this works more reliably than airdropping between my iPhone and MacBook… which seems to be 50% success rate at best.


I was never able to make it work, for some reason.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: