I though zero-day meant actively being exploited in the wild before a patch is available?

Zero day means that there is zero days between a patch being available and the vulnerability being disclosed (as opposed to the patch being available before disclosure).

Discovering a zero day implies that there is no patch, but the term is talking about how long the vendor has known about the vulnerability.

I think this problem is one that AI could actually help with- simply snap a photo of my school calendar and ask the ai to add the important items to my personal calendar.

But I don't need the AI to do this everyday, just when i get a new calendar.

Musk is the majority owner, but he is not the only owner. So the discussion is probably amongst senior leadership from both companies and probably involves other significant owners.

Django doesn't force anyone to use the automatic migrations, you can always write them manually if you want to :)

Are the UK cameras non-mobile and clearly marked? Making the cameras mobile and not making them obvious should fix that problem.

Still plenty of mobile cameras in the UK

Polygamy is a fundamental religious practice by some religions too, but the US Supreme Court already ruled that the government can restrict it. (Though this article is talking about England and Wales... which also don't allow polygamy, so...)

I think it would be better to have the debate on circumcision in the legislature/parliament, but I am not opposed to outlawing it.

Not really, because the problem isn't investors buying homes, its a lack of supply of new homes. Big investors don't buy homes to keep them empty, they buy them to rent them out. An exception to this might be short term rentals but that is going to be significant in only a few markets and the problem there is still fundamentally a supply problem.

But even by long term renting they’re driving up home prices.

There is nothing fancy about it. The reasoning is straight forward and has the exact same impact that paying dividends has, from the perspective of the shareholder. (Well, actually in some ways maybe a better impact, as it makes complying with idiotic tax laws easier)

That is neat- any idea what they consider an eligible organization?

They're probably using something like https://benevity.com/ to do the vetting, esp. for non US charities.

1) Software licenses are generally about copyright, though sometimes contain patent licensing provisions. Right now, there is significant legal debate on if training LLMs violates copyright or is fair use.

2) Most OSS licenses require attributeion, something LLM code generation does not really do.

So IF training an LLM is restrctable by copyright, most OSS licenses practically speaking are incompatible with LLM training.

Adding some text that specifically limits LLM training would likely run afould of the open source definitions freedom from discrimination principle.