Its not there because a lot of the providers werent providing until recently, and higher spatial resolutions, referesh times and higher compute costs meant that no one used them in prod. We tried with ECMWF-AIFS however ENS + IFS was bettter better.

One is a AI company first, the other has tons of other services and they can just buy those outright.

Everytime someone is using httpx I always wonder why use that especially when niquests exists? I feel like it has always been such a better package

Also niquests as well which is a dropin replacement and imo wayyy better than httpx

niquest is something like a one-man-show, which is an issue-per-se

Of course, it is clearly superior to everything else (being authored by a french guy !). But sadly, some people do not accept this simple fact :(

“Niquer” means “to f*ck” in French slang

idk man, we pay stupid amounts of money to microsoft, we are an enterprise customer, expecting better availablity compared to my laptop isnt really a high bar.

My company is not even the same ballpark, but even we already have people for it. And doesn't include the fact that you can get a colo location and just a MSP or a contractor to do it for you

For not being stuck at any shenanigans that might happen at East Croydon.

Its gatwick, 3 lines go here, one every 15 minutes. I have always taken the train to either Heathrow or Gatwick, there's always been more than enough space to accomodate luggage, idk what people here are on about.

>But in general now trend is to use normal databases from IT world in OT world to overcome some legacy solutions.

Someone tell my company this please ;-;

Based on us keeping a replica of our AVEVA data archive in delta tables which are just parquets; and only compressing the parquets in LZ4 and getting a fuck ton of more space savings. I would say yes. Especially when you're onprem with a dedupe storage appliance.

I think swinging door made sense when storage was slow and scrace, but nowadays storage is cheap (even with these prices)