Honest question: can you sue OpenAI for the attack coming out of their infrastructure with their tools or do they have the same safeguards as a free speech platform?

Also, can you at least ask them directly to put a permanent rule on their agent sandbox to never access your site?

Yes. Good design and a developer with good taste can make your site so much better than something mechanically excellent, but tasteless or derivative.

I love tailwind's work, but AI stole their customer base worse than a natural disaster would destroy a factory or other kind of business,

At least some of them got an escape plan before going bankrupt

And who will the shareholders blame when the business go under?

Is there a set of prompts to mitigate these claude-isms without losing reasoning or going full caveman mode?

Today I learned a new word...

Passive aggressive is an understatement. Why did it focuses on summarizing its sexual content guidelines before anything else?

I know the machine can't judge the user or browbeat them into changing subject, but the reply is a bit unsettling.

If they want to take my awful prompts and poison their model with it, it's their loss.

For anyone else that believes their input needs secrecy, you need to check the corporate plan of any provider for data protection clauses. Most use the cheaper plans as bait to get more training data and free feedback.

This is the first time an AI provider makes a trailer[0] for their main release and game development is the first demo and main hook.

Anthropic might dominate general purpose programming,but I think there's enough of a market for a model laser focused on game scripting or tool development for game studios.

I hope it succeeds in serving that audience.

[0]https://youtu.be/bn0atstgavo

Noob question, but is there, on a harness level, a way to compress or optimize the "pre processing prompt" or any other preamble?

I know you can give instructions to guide an agent, but they are still plain English, the interpretation still isn't absolute and the more rules, the less likely it is to respect the whole set of rules in the preamble, but the whole process seem so... "Unprofessional"?

As I see it, a tool should be reliable and the less bloat, less possible points of failure.LLMs seem overly verbose and you can't shake the feeling it might veer away from the objective at any point. You can pay to mitigate or work around the risk, but it still doesn't inspire confidence in anything with more than 30 lines