Isn't the real prize the library of personally-identified samples preserved in their "biobank" and not the methodologies or analysis they've applied to it so far...
I thought the touch bar was even worse than the butterfly keys...
I put off upgrading my personal MacBook for years after work issued me a MacBook with the touch bar. Such a usability nightmare for the sake of eye candy. That was a long seven years.
There was a Lenovo and an ASUS and an Acer in between but those all went in the graveyard pile before their second year was up and I had to keep resorting to the 2011 Macbook.
And that's counting the extra ~year I got out of the Lenovo after having to replace the fans.
Having user serviceable parts is nice but having parts that last 14 years is better. If there was a brand that did both, that's what I'd buy.
I can't concur. Growing up poor, I've only owned the cheapest Acers and HPs and none of them ever died on me. They're still at my parents place chugging along.
Later I switched to Lenovo when I got money and still no issues. Meanwhile all my mates with 2016-2018 era Macbooks have had endless issues, that they swore off ever buying Apple.
Anecdotal stories can swing in both directions, that's not proof of anything.
They are only misleading if you allow yourself to be misled by them. It's an extremely informative measurement if you are aware of how it works and don't misinterpret the results.
None of these claims are mutually exclusive with one another.
"Great tool for misleading results." -> the results the tool provides are either mostly misleading (many are misleading), or are in large part misleading (a large part of each is misleading), potentially both
"Traceroute is easy to be misinterpreted" -> the results the tool provides are easy to misinterpret
"They are only misleading if you allow yourself to be misled by them" -> the results the tool provides require expertise to interpret, implying that otherwise they're (largely) misleading - the same thing the person said right above you
This is turning into a "well I like it and it has its place". Cool, it's just not what was being argued.
Yes, you can. It's basically a terminal case of something being unintuitive. Whether something is misleading is in the eye of the beholder.
Recently my mother felt misled by a car commercial. Her position was that saying things like "under this many years or that many miles" is misleading, because it suggests that it's a set of options she can pick from (which of course ended up not being the case).
Unfortunately for her, this is a natural language construct - whether she understands it correctly or not depends on how aligned her common sense regarding it is with people at large. She understood it differently and thus felt misled. But you may notice that ultimately it was her own mistaken understanding of the common parlance that misled her. So when she said this was misleading the only thing I could reasonably say was exactly this. That I did not find the phrasing misleading, and I'm sorry she'd been misled by it (irrespective of whether that was on her or on the world, as that doesn't really matter).
It's completely on people how they want to handle this. You can find people being misled by stuff like this to be unreasonable and just tell them so, or you can put out a disclaimer regardless. Depends completely per case. This goes all the way to having multiple mechanical interlocks at places with heavy duty xray sources, or preferring machine checked memory management.
Traceroute doesn't use ping requests except with the old Windows binary. Usually it uses "Time-to-live (TTL) exceeded in transit" messages.
Beyond that technicality, your guess is often right... Routers will frequently prioritize forwarding packets over sending the TTL exceeded packets tools like MTR use to measure response times.
Also you can easily have the TTL expired message going via a different route on the return path (and indeed the same applies with your normal connections, asymetric routing can be a pain - especially in networks with rpf issues (multicast ones are a particular pain point), and with stateful firewalls, but most of the time it's fine. You just need to be aware.
Obviously you know, but for anyone else reading, a modern traceroute tool (like mtr) can send icmp, udp or tcp, on generic or specific ports. Indeed the default for mtr on my laptop is to use icmp.
Steam Deck succeeded where Steam Machines flopped because of nearly a decade of advancement on the Proton compatibility layer, so the catalog of eligible games is orders of magnitude larger than it was in 2015.
When Steam Machines re-launch with the current generation of Proton compatibility it will be an entirely different story.
The deck already has bluetooth for controllers and HDMI out if you get a standard USB3/HDMI dongle (or their expensive dock).
Essentially all you're asking for them to add is better specs.
In December their revised branding guidelines added a "Powered by SteamOS" badge so presumably 3rd-party boxes with various specs in set-top form factors will be coming before too long:
> The Powered by SteamOS logo indicates that a hardware device will run the
SteamOS and boot into SteamOS upon powering on the device. Partners /
manufacturers will ship hardware with a Steam image in the form provided by and/or developed in close collaboration with Valve.
Better specs would also be interesting, because Steam's current "Steam Deck Verified" does check if games run well on the Steam Deck's hardware. There's another check for text size on the smaller 7" screen too.
You could let users choose what to mirror, and one of those choices could be a big bucket of all the least available stuff, for pure preservationists who don't want to focus on particular segments of the data.
Sort of like the bittorrent algorithm that favors retrieving and sharing the least-available chunks if you haven't assigned any priority to certain parts.
I see 24 seeders for the entire 72-episode run of the 1991 sitcom "Herman's Head" which was so poorly rated that it's never seen a home media or streaming release, your premise doesn't hold any water at all.
People are pirating comic books and cookbooks from the 30s; there are a lot of people in this world, if something goes on the web and you tell everyone you put it there, it's pretty much preserved. It's only law enforcement that kills free availability of everything all the time online, for better or for worse.
With copyright, as individuals we get to trade all of the wonderful stuff already made (and long paid for) for the flood of minute-old shit and sludge inundating us online constantly. It's a bad trade. Maybe copyright should stop encouraging creativity; the answer to how "artists" would get paid post-copyright might be "who cares, quit if you want."
We already have Herman's Head, we don't need any more crap.
I never thought about UBI and copyright - but as soon as you say that, it is immediately obvious to me that when we have some kind of UBI, copyright should be dramatically reduced.
> With copyright, as individuals we get to trade all of the wonderful stuff already made (and long paid for) for the flood of minute-old shit and sludge inundating us online constantly.
What does this have to do with copyright? People post sludge online even in chaotic meme environments where copyright is irrelevant and people constantly take and repost each others' stuff.
