Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | refurb's commentslogin

Indeed it’s an odd argument. The regime is immensely unpopular. If it weren’t for the murderous crackdown they would have been overthrown long ago.

There is a good case to be made that if it weren't for the consistent pressure, sanctions and assassinations from US/Israel, the moderates would have prevailed in Iran.

Saddam was immensely unpopular. The Taliban was immensely unpopular.

It doesn't mean that people like America- or Israel.

Every country has it's own elite who have their agenda independent from whatever the White House wants.


It’ll be fun getting the rest of the story.

And regardless, why would a country let a foreigner in order to go to a protest?

Canada has banned people who came to Canada to speak because they didn’t like what they had to say.


Nobody ran a control? It’s the most concept of experimentation.

How could you possibly know your analytical technique was valid if you don’t run a blank to see?


Stopping progress because you put people out of work is a great way to stall all development.

By that same logic we’d stop doctors from using antibiotics because now barbers will lose their job of bloodletting.


A free market is individuals and companies can willing enter whatever transaction they want.

If someone is willing to pay for a reservation and a restaurant willing to take payment, then it’s a free market. It’s not inefficient at all.

You may not like it, but that doesn’t mean it’s not free


The original post was talking about the scenario of third-party reservations trading marketplaces. In that scenario, reservations become financialized derivatives of the underlying supply of food at a restaurant. But this is being done in a really dumb way where fake demand is being injected to make the reservation independently valuable from the underlying.

To be perfectly clear, bots don't eat food, and we don't need a market to tell us otherwise. Even an individual having Google Duplex reserve ten tables in advance isn't going to be able to eat ten dinners. But if reservations actually cost money, then any restaurant doing the smart thing of just skipping no-shows to keep the kitchen running is now defrauding reservation holders. Capacity has to be reserved and left fallow for the sake of optionality.

Bringing this back to market terms: if reservations are so in demand that restaurants have to charge for them, why don't they just raise the prices on the actual food instead?


Just because a particular market is free doesn't mean it's useful to society at large.

If it's not useful to society, society has no moral reason to tolerate it. If it indeed benefits a few individuals massively while on net reducing utility to society, an argument can be made that society has a moral imperative to ban it. Hence the limitations on gambling, on alcohol and tobacco marketing/sales, etc.


> Just because a particular market is free doesn't mean it's useful to society

Of course not.

> If it's not useful to society, society has no moral reason to tolerate it

Then it’s not a free market.


But then you don't need to have the restaurant at all, you just need to have the idea of a restaurant that sells the idea of a booking. Someone decides they want to pay £100 for a booking at Restaurant A, which actually only exists on paper, so now they have a restaurant booking. They can then trade that booking to you for some other amount of money, if they want to make a profit on it. How badly do you want to have a booking at Restaurant A?

And now, you want to actually go to Restaurant A and eat a curry, but they look at you like you've grown an extra head. Eat Food? What, here? In Restaurant A?

Congratulations, you've just invented banking, where people look at you similarly if you attempt to actually go and collect the gold that your bank says represents the money that's actually stored as a series of north and south magnetic domains on a thin sheet of rust painted onto a rapidly-spinning aluminium disk.

Meanwhile I ring the guy at the restaurant started by his grandmother when she fled Pakistan at the end of the Second World War, about ten minutes before we show up, and when I get there I've got a pint of Guinness, a menu, and some chapatis and chutney already on the table.

I prefer it that way. The food's better, for a start.

I don't need the menu, the guy's just going to bring me the desi shit from the family meal.


This blog post confuses “rent seeking” with “economic transactions I don’t like”.

Creating a closed source model and charging for it is not “rent seeking”.


Yes, the “experts” like the head of the HHS that was a lawyer and former DA in California.

What I find funny is there is zero proof of any connection to the President yet we have 350+ comments of people 100% sure they know what’s going on.

Honestly? It’s all pretty boring.


They already tried for 4 years starting in 2016. It was all a bust even when they played loose with facts.

That’s AI.

I thought people knew not to believe anything they read online?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: