This kind of "tool" is exactly what we need.

Looks really good and the only change I would personally do is on the editor page remove the section below the editor.

Other than that good work :)

Thank you! I thought having some stuff underneath would help google pic it up and show more folks but if its distracting ill cut it. Also added a free image compressor tool on the site now too.

I'm no expert in this niche but I really do like the design of your project.

Great work :)

No need to be an expert to enjoy Software craft! Thanks for sharing :)

Interesting, but I wonder if this shifts too much complexity onto the user.

tmux is powerful, but not exactly approachable, and "multi-agent orchestration" on top of it feels like something that could get hard to reason about quickly. Curious how you think about UX here.

Tmux is pretty easy to pick up and build muscle memory by learning a few keyboard shortcuts from a basic youtube video and it's handy when you don't want to switch screens between multiple terminals just for one thing.

The ability to split and divide the screen pretty simply with a few keys is handy for anyone who spends enough time in a shell - the abilty to save that layout for the shell items you're using to load up easily again the next time is valuable too.

Multi agent orchestration likely just means keeping track of a few different windows all on one screen.

Good points and indeed thinking about this quite a bit. Currently leaning towards a CLI first approach so that Claude/Cursor/[insert coding agent] can configure and control the ide. Feels a bit meta, but also makes it extremely user-friendly.

This seems useful, but I wonder about edge cases:

- dynamically generated code - reflection-heavy systems - implicit coupling (shared schemas, conventions, etc)

These are usually where simple maps break down and why people fall back to full-text or embeddings.

Fun concept and clean design very good game. :)

Thanks. Enjoy playing!

I think "gambling" is a bit too strong, but there is a real shift in how we evaluate correctness. With traditional coding, you reason step by step and with AI-assisted code, you're often validating outputs after the fact.

The risk isn't randomness per se it's over trusting something that looks correct. The skill ceiling is moving from "can you write it" to "can you reliably verify it"

But “reliably verify it” was always the critical difference between high and low quality engineering efforts.

Good programmers might have made things that “performed well”, and had “few bugs”, without this step, but it was not robust to changes over time. If we end up in a place where every project has solid automated verification, perhaps things get better overall.

Neat idea - using the keychain for master key storage is a clean solution for the solo developer case.

If the team sharing and multi-environment side ever becomes a problem, we've been working on something similar at envmaster.dev that might be worth a look.