Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | spzb's commentslogin

Interesting bias to blame the woman. How do you know that the second twin wasn't taking advantage of their identical looks to convince the woman it was the same man she had slept with the first time? She may not even have been aware that he had an identical sibling.

Oh, I blame everyone who was aware.

If one brother was pretending to be the other I blame him more.


The buried lede in that link is that mothers who don't have custody of their children are more likely to remain in close emotional contact with their children than fathers are when in the same position. So children living with dad still benefit from having both parents involved in their upbringing. Which undermines OP's assertion that this child would be better off without their mother around.

Yes, involvement from both parents seems to be the major factor regardless of sex. There is likely additional research needed on why fathers disengage more when the mother has primary custody. With a majority of single parent households being headed by mothers, it seems another area ripe for research is how unlikely it is that the majority of fathers are disengaged to create such a large effect on the whole single mother cohort. Likewise, with the way custody tends to be grated in court, you would expect single father households to have a higher percentage of unengaged mothers due if it was determined that the mothers were the lesser choice for child welfare. I would guess looking at outcomes where one parent died would mostly control for that support mechanism.

The burden of proof falls on the person making the assertion. Why should anyone else have to do the work that he/she/they didn't bother with?

"Why should anyone else have to do the work that he/she/they didn't bother with?"

Because they are curious (consistent with the culture of this site). They would also be more likely to trust their own sources, I assume.


Trusting sources because they are your "own" is just asking for bias to be ingrained.

Yet it's well known that if you want someone to change their mind it's most likely to occur if they think it's their own idea/doing. You're more likely to argue with me than if you just read sources you found and independently came to the conclusion.

[citation needed]

I don't have a lot of experience with them but I would have thought static analysis tools circa 2020 would have managed it just fine.

The output wouldn't be anything nearly as good, comprehensive and informative as this website.

No tooling, no animation, no hidden features, no explanation of how things work upon clicking them.

But I'm glad to be proven wrong if you know a static analysis tool I can point to the repo and come up with comparable result.


>Documentation quality hasn't dropped because the AI learned from the best

Yet


Can't say for sure but the first commit was only four days ago and has a gitignore mentioning to Claude so probably yes. https://github.com/hectorvent/floci/blob/main/.gitignore

Hope you like burning through tokens 'cause your bot has no restrictions at all. It just gave me Python code for calculating pi and then a detailed itinerary for a three day trip to Vancouver.


haha, good catch! I focused on the AEC logic but did not put enough on the general guardrails. Your vancouver and Pi questions, including someone else on marine vessels seemed to have slipped thru. Got questions about refining Uranium and stuff, I'll be tightening the system prompt to manage this. Appreciate the stress test!


In a normal world, price per terabyte would fall as a consequence of greater storage density and better power efficiency. A world with AI and a brewing oil crisis is not like that.


That is not true. HDD Drive price or cost per TB hasn't dropped for a very long time long before the AI craze.

Is this a paid ad placement? I'm seeing a load of breathless "commentary" on Taalas and next to no serious discussion about whether their approach is even remotely scalable. A one-off tech demo using a comparatively ancient open source model is hardly going to be giving Jensen Huang sleepless nights.


Probably being astroturfed by people with a financial interest in it working. The critical commentary in this thread is what to watch for.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: