Yeah Sam Altman's kids will use chatbots but here's the difference, your kids no matter the amount of money you're willing to spend will never ever get to use the chatbots Sam Altman's kids will have access to to build their legacy.
> The point is that a "secure coding platform" leaked something they were trying to keep under wraps, whether the contents of the leak matter or not
Sure, but that's completely different from what they were responding to to, which was someone insinuating the Claude Code CLI has secret sauce that makes it better than the competition.
No reasonable person actually thinks that Claude Code cannot make mistakes. So if your point is that this is going to change anybody's opinion about it then I think that's pretty silly.
Also who really cares about the roadmap? Any feature they release can be easily copied quickly. The only moat they have at the moment is in giving access to their models via a subscription.
yeah it actually works to use claude to reverse engineer itself; I've used that to workaround some problems. E.g. that's how I discovered that I had to put two slashes for absolute paths in sandbox config. The thing is, the claude team is so quick that soon enough they add more and more features and fix more and more bugs that your workarounds become obsolete
I think we still skew back to an insanely high input token ratio when you consider agentic loops. For example, when I see the tools I use do a web fetch or a search or other tool use, it's an incredibly high number of new input tokens.
reply