Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | x3n0ph3n3's commentslogin

Just use uBlock origin and this filter: https://github.com/i5heu/ublock-hide-yt-shorts

Last time I tried a shorts blocker the entire YouTube crashed

Never once had that problem.

Gladly. How do I do that on my roku?

If you're using a native YouTube app, you've already lost the battle.

Obviously. Which belies your "just do this...". You may as well say "just watch dvds". An exactly equally effective solution.

iSponsorBlockTV running in docker on a system on the network can remote skip ads for all yt apps that it have been added to its monitoring. works great for appletv. But nothing is as good as SmartTube on androidtv.

Anyone working for a company like that should be deeply ashamed of themselves.

I have an opposite reaction for what I assume are reasons we agree on.

Social media has been a transparent race to the bottom for many years. The sooner it is shittified beyond repair the better. AI flooding content to them should help speedrun its descent, or maybe I’ve giving the average user (above child age) too much credit.


Has accelerationism worked before?

WW2 produced some diplomatically-brilliant world leaders. I think you could say that any situation that's headed in an unsustainable direction is being affected by accelerationism. In fact, the old observation "a fool will become a master if he perseveres in his folly" is much about the same thing.

I think accelerationism specifically refers to doing it on purpose. I doubt many of the decision-makers in WW2 were driven by a desire to elevate and support corrupt institutions as much as possible in the hopes that the corruption inherent in the system would lead to a collapse and people would have no choice but to cooperate towards a brighter and more progressive tomorrow.

And anyone that wants to use WW2 as a model for their theory of change is also (I hope) glossing over the abominable death toll. "Once sufficient 10s of millions of people die, everyone will be so horrified and traumatized by the widespread death and destruction that they'll be have no choice but to collaborate to enact the better world I'm picturing," beyond relying on an n of 1 and ignoring the decades of cold war that ensued, is also...hard to argue is worth it.


I think so. These sites can be hardened by relying on people following who they know, but the slop ruins discoverability. That's also partially the reason people moved to TikTok from older, more dumped-on platforms.

...so TikTok is less dumped on?

I assume it was when it was newer, as they all were.

It might still be. It's not so much about the quality of the content as you or I would judge it, it's the authenticity.

It's the authenticity, but even more than that it's the saturation of inauthenticity. Even if there's oodles of authentic content, if there's enough inauthentic content to drown it out, you enter a vicious cycle where plummeting interactions and new authentic content both deed each other.

I have a hypothesis that network effects kick in for social interaction before they do for monetisation, which is why the advertisers/influencers/propagandists/scammers(/trolls, though this is different) are in a constant state of hunting down and infesting whatever platform good-faith users have most recently fled them too. Part of it is likely that smaller communities are more robust and have an easier time identifying and repelling smaller-scale incursions, but I suspect a big part is that smaller communities simply aren't worth the investment of larger incursions, especially since they'll more easily be ruined before any real payout.

Anyway, I agree with you that "quality" (as in effort and craft) is lower on the list of factors than authenticity, which makes complete sense. There was a time when a well-crafted ad was worthy of note, but ads have been so sneaky and pervasive that I think many people are desperate to have a spontaneous interaction or experience that's not trying to sell them anything.


I'm not sure if LLMs can be ashamed of themselves.

/s


I wonder how many people can be ashamed of themselves these days

!/s?


He similarly killed VMware during his tenure there. Now it's a subsidiary of Broadcom and a shell of its former self.

It's also difficult to write characters that are smarter than the writer. See how poorly TV and movie writers portray intelligent characters.

Yeah, but he also took students' PII and put it on his website. If someone did that in a bar, there's a good chance they'd get their face punched by others in the bar.

Who is Scott Lawson and why does he have such bad ideas?

It's a shame that calculus isn't required by every college degree. Just because I'm not integrating functions during my normal work, doesn't mean I don't benefit from understanding the fundamental principles.

Yes, totally. I was about to undero surgery but found out the doctor didn't even know about Laplace transforms. He small-mindedly spent his formative years learning anatomy, never benefitting from the knowledge of frequency-domain derivatives. I dodged that bullet by storming out.

You joke, but if you talked to a doctor of radiology odds are they at least took a class covering Fourier Transforms.

Would you say the same about learning Christianity: maybe not directly useful for your job, however it is rather foundational to much of English society.

Yeah! I've found that learning the foundations of religions is a great way to inoculate people from worst aspects of those ideas.

I use Cursor and have been pretty happy with the Plan -> Revise -> Build -> Correct flow. I don't write everything with it, but the planning step does help me clarify my thoughts at times.

One of the things that has helped the most is all the documentation I wrote inside the repository before I started using AI. It was intended for consumption by other engineers, but I think Cursor has consumed it more than any human. I've even managed to make improvements not by having AI update it, but asking AI "What unanswered questions do you have based on reading the documentation?" It has helped me fill in gaps and add clarity.

Another thing I've gotten a ton of value with is having it author diagrams. I've had it create diagrams with both the mermaid syntax and AWSDAC (Diagram-as-Code). I've always found crafting diagrams a painstaking process. I have it make a first pass by analyzing my code + configuration, then make corrections and adjustments by explaining the changes I want.

In my own PRs, I have been in the habit of posting my Cursor Plan document and Transcript so that others can learn from it. I've also encouraged other team members to do the same.

I feel bad for any teams that are being mandated to use a certain amount of AI. It seems to me that the only way to make it work is by having teams experiment with it and figure out how to best use it given their product and the team's capacity. AI is like a pair of Wile-E-Coyote rocket skates. It'll get you somewhere fast, but unless you've cleared the road of debris and pointed in exactly the right direction, you're going to careen off a cliff or into a wall.


You can see it in Tyler Sheridan's tv shows as well. It's not just "the message."


There are so many mistakes being made here:

- Not using remote state management (setting up an S3 backend is easy and you're already in AWS!)

- Allowing an AI agent to execute against your production environment (especially with no guardrails)

- Not confirming the plan (which I _could_ excuse if one's pipeline is mature enough)

- Not confirming the resources Claude identified automatically before letting it delete things

- Combining 2 projects into the same state.

These mistakes are so horribly egregious that I feel second-hand embarrassment.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: