> Okay sure, but what happens when a high CVE is discovered that requires immediate patching
I'm pretty sure, once cooldowns are widely implemented, the first priority of attackers will become to convince people to make an exception for their update because "this is really really urgent" etc.
At least it’s a bit harder because you need to finesse the manual review somehow; and it’ll leave a bigger paper trail. It’s not a perfect defence but it’s an improvement.
University has never been more not difficult. Cheating is rampant and the whole institution is organized arpund prioritizing students graduating over protecting the integrity of credentials.
I wonder if that might be another reason to just completely disable this feature and not make it a permission: otherwise people could use it to build trainingsets for geoguesser models.
There are a LOT of stages between "resigning and doing nothing" and "deadly violence" that have some effect.
Demonstrations are a start, though they seem to be more useful for networking inside a group and forcing the press to pay attention to some matter. Decision makers can easily ignore them.
What's less easy to ignore are strikes, especially general strikes, as e.g. port workers in Italy threatened during the total blockade in the Gaza war.
Given what AI has always been about, since well before LLMs, go-slows and work-to-rules aren't going to help, they'll just speed up transitions to AI.
The disinvestment, boycotts, public shunning, adverse publicity, picketing, blockades, I can see those working. Certainly seems to have an impact in the video game news I see.
Those only work as long as legislators have shame, or there is a significant faction that can use the provided legitimacy to redistribute power away from the elites towards the people. That's not the case at a national level in the US right now.
This is gonna be interesting with all the anti-zionist Jews in the US or the religious zionist evangelical christians...
But it's in line with the pro-Israel pattern of putting words into peoples' mouth or simply asserting that certain terms are "codes" that mean something different than what the speaker actually said.
reply