I could not find any entry in the FAQ about how this new way of delivering web pages will negatively affect users who have made the conscious choice to reduce their privacy exposure through the express blocking of undesirable 3rd parties.
For example, if I block network requests to Facebook everywhere by default, I feel confident that my IP address does not show up in the logs of Facebook's servers. Blocking those 3rd parties on web pages is what actually contributes best to make web pages load much faster.
I loaded the URL of the AMP-based web page posted somewhere here[1], and it does look like the ability to clearly distinguish and filter network requests based on whether they are 3rd-party is removed.
I would like more details about this, because so far my understanding is that 3rd parties are becoming obfuscated with this new method of delivering web pages. I find having one entity (ampproject.org) to serve pages from various sites is quite worrisome privacy-wise.
For example, if I block network requests to Facebook everywhere by default, I feel confident that my IP address does not show up in the logs of Facebook's servers. Blocking those 3rd parties on web pages is what actually contributes best to make web pages load much faster.
I loaded the URL of the AMP-based web page posted somewhere here[1], and it does look like the ability to clearly distinguish and filter network requests based on whether they are 3rd-party is removed.
I would like more details about this, because so far my understanding is that 3rd parties are becoming obfuscated with this new method of delivering web pages. I find having one entity (ampproject.org) to serve pages from various sites is quite worrisome privacy-wise.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10345795