Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

These websites have the low median score. That is, many submissions, many of them not relevant, so the median is low.


"Not relevant" is not the same as "not upvoted." There are a number of reasons why a submission does not receive many upvotes which are unrelated to the quality of the content itself, which is why HN has repost rules.

The 10 story minimum is to ensure a reasonable threshold for error and so a single submissions with 1000+ points (e.g. Show HNs) don't skew the results.


Do you mean that duplicates from popular sources (NY Times, WSJ, etc) spoil stats for these sources?


Not duplicates, but more noise than signal.


Actually if you look at others' analyses[0] some of those sites have a high mean and/or median. On median score alone samaltman.com should be #1. The highest "mainstream" news source would be newyorker.com, it does have a low median, but the average is ~20 times greater.

[0] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-TCo1mxiTkO4ZiXg5acU...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: