What I thought was "odd" was reacting to community feedback that OS involvement was so prized by closing the issue (and therefore discussion) without explaining why this decision was made.
Perhaps more seriously concerning is that it took people rooting through the code and issues to discover that this was the case.
Many would say that security companies have something of a duty to be open-source; I think they at least ought to announce that they've deprecated the open-source versions of their code!
What I thought was "odd" was reacting to community feedback that OS involvement was so prized by closing the issue (and therefore discussion) without explaining why this decision was made.
Perhaps more seriously concerning is that it took people rooting through the code and issues to discover that this was the case.
Many would say that security companies have something of a duty to be open-source; I think they at least ought to announce that they've deprecated the open-source versions of their code!