No, let's skip technical details and your opinion about frameworks as code sharing primitive and get back to your words. You literally claimed that while Wil made money "leaning heavily on some of the most well-designed frameworks in the industry", he said "frameworks are bullshit".
This isn't true: he said that people shouldn't use a specific way of sharing code in OS X, not that "frameworks are bullshit". He even said that "Apple's shared frameworks are very useful for sharing executable code and its associated resources among multiple applications". He also praises Cocoa, the framework, and many other frameworks created by Apple.
So, yes, you did misrepresent Wil's opinion, and you should take your words back.
"The absolute worst thing ever, completely beyond bad, lower than horrible, and more crappy than explosive diarrhoea"
So when I wrote "bullshit", my only crime was that I was being euphemistic. Guilty as charged. And as I wrote, he makes this farcical distinction between Apple and the rest of the world.
So, no, I did not misrepresent Wil's opinion, apart from softening it up. So you should take your words back.
This isn't true: he said that people shouldn't use a specific way of sharing code in OS X, not that "frameworks are bullshit". He even said that "Apple's shared frameworks are very useful for sharing executable code and its associated resources among multiple applications". He also praises Cocoa, the framework, and many other frameworks created by Apple.
So, yes, you did misrepresent Wil's opinion, and you should take your words back.