Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Realistically, I don't think you can have a minimalist, clean and focused code base with thousands of engineers pounding away at the keyboard. You ought to make some trade offs with that many employees.


That sounds like reverse justification, i.e.,

Google's operations probably require X lines of clean code added everyday by 10% of the engineers (so ~5000 instead of ~50,000 engineers), but because of the sheer number of engineers Google has, that are supposed to do something continuously to show performance, Google has ended up with ~10 or ~100 X lines of daily bloat accumulation.

Sounds like a textbook example of too-many-hands-spoiling-the-broth.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: