Hey, I just wanted to shout out and say that your reply here is refreshing. I appreciate that you admit that the feature is "kinda wonky" and that you're still looking at and intellectually rationalizing about such things. There's no harm in trying out the various constructor approaches, and then see how it feels in the real world.

This is refreshing from other newish (cough golang) languages which pick the "wonky" path, but go on to defend it tirelessly. Keep up the good work.