> you can build parking deep under ground. Heck, giving the tendency for the quality of offices, you can build underground office floors too :)

Next to the bay? That would be...either disastrous or ludicrously expensive.

The capacity of the roads and highways that feed the campus is more of an issue.

Giving the stakes, Google probably would build an additional on/off ramp and may be an additional lane on 101 themselves if permitted :)

Indeed, their plan that the city rejected did include an additional off ramp.

But highways are nonetheless terribly inefficient. One extra lane or off ramp isn't enough to handle all of Google's traffic. They've already widened 101 around Google, rebuilt the whole Shoreline/85/101 interchange area to add more lanes, etc. The bottleneck is the off ramps themselves and the local streets -- they cause traffic to back up onto the freeway and make all lanes congested.

The real solution is to allow more housing to be built close to the campus, and elsewhere in Mountain View, so that more people can walk/bike/take transit. The land use just across 101 is really inefficient right now.

Indeed, there's been discussion about connecting Moffett Blvd to the North Bayshore neighborhood a new bridge over the creek that would connect to La Avenida. And creating a spur of the Light Rail system into the neighborhood as well.

Geology has to be better. It'd flood.

use higher (river dam / tunnel) grade concrete right from the bedrock.