Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

epsilon log(r) is the "shielding". I suspect that the field inside will be attenuated by a factor of 1/(epsilon log(r)).


epsilon is the gap, so either way it should be on opposite side of the log(r). Smaller gap, stronger shielding but smaller radius weaker shielding. Am I going nuts?


Hm I guess you're right. I don't know what to tell you. I guess we'd have to have a look at the exact definitions they use in the paper :-)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: