Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No. Convenience doesn't trump everything, economics does. Banks with better security can offer cheaper services to merchants, and the merchants lower prices to the customer.

You don't lose money with the stripe in the US because the banks eat the (massive) losses. Here they don't, because of the better tech. You can still use the stripe, but the merchant takes the liability. It's up to them. Guess why they don't...

So no, convenience doesn't trump everything.

Oh, and in the US you have to wait and sign a piece of paper, eating into your precious time.



> Banks with better security can offer cheaper services to merchants

Yeah, like we know that will ever happen.

> economics

Then let the banks allow people to chose what type of card they want, allow merchants to charge different price based on the type of card, allow merchants to implement paying before scanning, etc. Basically, allow the economy to work. The system works the way it works (in any country) because of fixed regulations. There's no economy. Neither consumers not merchants have any say in how anything works.

> Oh, and in the US you have to wait and sign a piece of paper, eating into your precious time.

Usually you "sign" on some electronic POS, but this time is comparable to the time spent entering the PIN, still much less than the extra time required to wait for the chip transaction to go through at the end of shopping session.


Yeah, the banks are totally going to offer a fraud-prone product for morons who want to pay higher prices and save 2 seconds. This is nonsense.

You have to wait for the transaction to go through regardless. With a chip you just have to wait before removing the card, as a security feature.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: