Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But your whole premise is false. From the OP: "And to upend the inevitable backlash that news will receive (spoiler alert), using all the raw data without performing any analysis would actually produce the appearance of more warming since the start of records in the late 1800s."


I don't know how they came up with this sentence. I'm sure it is true in some sense of the word "true." But just look at the data:

https://judithcurry.com/2014/07/07/understanding-adjustments...

Perhaps OP is talking about some older data before the cutoff of this graph.

Edit: the Guardian article posted elsewhere shows the opposite:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97...

Amusingly, the Guardian illustration is credited to the same person who wrote the article I cite: Zeke Hausfather.

Welcome to the world of climate statistics. When bar charts drive trillions of dollars in public policy, they tend to get pretty wonky, pretty fast...


It is due to the adjustments of the ocean temperature data. The SST data has been adjusted upward. Due to the adjustments the global temperature is estimated to be warmer in the past than the raw data show (http://variable-variability.blogspot.com.au/2015/02/homogeni...)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: