Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If they had to sell because they built a business they couldn't afford to run… it's their fault, not Apple's.

Again, blame the founders who sold the business, not the buyer.



I agree with you, I think LaLa had an innovative and interesting model; however, it wasn't profitable and tht's why Apple was able to buy it --clearly they had something else in mind.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: