Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As I understand it, the initial failure happened while it was operating inside of design tolerances.

The unusually wet year and failure of the emergency spillway then forced them to run the main spillway at a high rate despite the damage.



I don't believe the emergency spillway actually failed, just that they were afraid it might, and the results of that would be pretty catastrophic.


I guess it ends up depending on how failure is defined for a given context. It didn't fail in the sense that the area still holds back water. It did fail in the sense that they believed it to be unsafe to continue using it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: