Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ya, I really don't see how they can justify displaying other people's content. They did the work, but they don't get the clicks or ad revenue or even a chance to keep the user on the site.

I wonder how Google would like it if someone launched a site that when you search, it doesn't display results from its own database, but perhaps just a selection of the best results from Google.



It is funny you say that.

I remember when you would search for an answer, and a small answer would be included in the description under the link, so you wouldn't have to click on it.

Then they started to go away, because no one was clicking on them because they didn't need to.

Now you rarely get the answer without clicking on it.

So Google has made the internet worse.


>So Google has made the internet worse.

By not including the answer?

Or, by including the answer and putting the sites that gave reliable answers out of business in the first place?


There are sites like that. Startpage.com is an example.


I always thought that services like Startpage or DDG paid for access to search databases, it maybe some form of revenue sharing. It's not that they're stealing the search results from Bing or Google and repackage them.


Perhaps you're right.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: