Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Or they could just do nothing, not spend any money, and not share the content. That's the zero-cost option, and almost certainly what they'll do.

The benefit was to the public to have access to the material, much less so to Berkeley. By putting the onus on Berkeley to caption the videos, they've (very reasonably) just pulled them down, and the public loses.



> and the public loses.

You mean some of the public loses. Others in the public never had access to lose.

People said the same thing when the government decided buildings should have ramps, public bathrooms, etc. Things worked out OK.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: