I'm guessing a possible resolution is to disseminate the responsibility that a CEO holds.
I've never been at that level of management, but it appears that other players (inside and out of an org) require a single point-of-contact, or ultimate authority.
I think this might be better, simply because 1:1 relationships are easier to coordinate than 1:n (chair and council), or n:m (council and lieutenants), which dissemination might bring.
My counter question is: where would the buck stop?
I've never been at that level of management, but it appears that other players (inside and out of an org) require a single point-of-contact, or ultimate authority. I think this might be better, simply because 1:1 relationships are easier to coordinate than 1:n (chair and council), or n:m (council and lieutenants), which dissemination might bring.
My counter question is: where would the buck stop?