> This becomes less of an issue once you go through some abstract algebra. But typically, constants would come from the start of the English alphabet, and vectors, from the end.
That rule gets broke quite a bit though. For example, if you have a optimization program with some affine inequality constraint A * x <= b, it's not uncommon to refer to the individual hyperplane constraints as a_i^T x <= b_i.
Math obviously has many more concepts than we have notation so selecting a unique notation for each concept is not feasible, but I bet some standardization can be done.
> Did the code remain "worst" after you found out the names came from a paper?
No, I am fine with naming things after variables from papers, but I always put a note as to which paper the notation came from. Giving someone a few hundred lines of code where few variables have more than 2 letters and no context is just cruel though.
That rule gets broke quite a bit though. For example, if you have a optimization program with some affine inequality constraint A * x <= b, it's not uncommon to refer to the individual hyperplane constraints as a_i^T x <= b_i.
Math obviously has many more concepts than we have notation so selecting a unique notation for each concept is not feasible, but I bet some standardization can be done.
> Did the code remain "worst" after you found out the names came from a paper?
No, I am fine with naming things after variables from papers, but I always put a note as to which paper the notation came from. Giving someone a few hundred lines of code where few variables have more than 2 letters and no context is just cruel though.