In the absence of wolves, you get coyotes and coy-dogs, which are as bad, if not... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		douche on May 11, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Wyoming's War on Wolves In the absence of wolves, you get coyotes and coy-dogs, which are as bad, if not worse than wolves, filling that niche. Nasty creatures.

throwaway2048 on May 11, 2017 [–]

If you truly think that coyotes and coy-dogs are "as bad or worse" than wolves, in terms of being dangerous to humans, you don't have a clue sorry.

douche on May 12, 2017 | [–]

Not humans, but they eat every other animal out, decimating the deer, rabbits, turkeys, about anything smaller than moose.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact