Both are peer reviewed science at the end of the day. What's to say the climatology studies are "rigorously recorded and analyzed" any better than the psychology studies? Am I to trust climatologists more than neuropsychologists for some reason?
* Both are experts in their field
* Both have prestigious journals
* Both are supposed to have a peer review process that prevents bogosity from being published and accepted.
Yet in one field, the peer review process, the ultimate guard that's supposed to prevent junk science from being published, failed. Is failing. Repeatedly. For a long time. It's not one failure, it's a chain of systemic failures.
That tells me that the entire concept of peer review is not immune to degenerating. And if it can happen in one field, it can happen in another, especially one that's harshly politicized (which psychology isn't, at least not anywhere near the same insane degree).
> That tells me that the entire concept of peer review is not immune to degenerating. And if it can happen in one field, it can happen in another, especially one that's harshly politicized (which psychology isn't, at least not anywhere near the same insane degree).
Politization occurs almost only in the US.
Are you accusing the scientists of being politized?
Do you have any argument for your claims of not reprodicibility in climate science?
Do you have any argument for doubting the data that has been used for more than 40 years?
Do you have any argument apart of your political views?
* Both are experts in their field
* Both have prestigious journals
* Both are supposed to have a peer review process that prevents bogosity from being published and accepted.
Yet in one field, the peer review process, the ultimate guard that's supposed to prevent junk science from being published, failed. Is failing. Repeatedly. For a long time. It's not one failure, it's a chain of systemic failures.
That tells me that the entire concept of peer review is not immune to degenerating. And if it can happen in one field, it can happen in another, especially one that's harshly politicized (which psychology isn't, at least not anywhere near the same insane degree).