Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's a real problem, but it's still orders of magnitude less harmful than coal.

(Also, as a Kentuckian I'm curious what "the equivalent of Kentucky" is.) :)



> Also, as a Kentuckian I'm curious what "the equivalent of Kentucky" is.

He's probably in Eastern or Northern Europe and talking about Chernobyl.


Nobody is denying that nuclear is less harmful than coal. But for future investments, the comparison should be with solar and wind.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: