Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thank you. It was an embarrassingly badly written article, not to even define the basic terms.


The author is allowed to expect a certain domain knowledge. For example, an article about an advanced physics topic is not expected to explain Newton's laws.


Agreed. I should have been more clear on my criticism. If the author had the goal of convincing people beyond their existing audience then explaining their terms would have helped significantly.


They weren't trying to convince people beyond their existing audience. They're talking to the academic publishing audience, for whom these terms are quite standard.

Because when it comes down to it, "Hacker News thinks this is swell" doesn't actually matter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: