Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ok, so we can forget it was initially sold as anonymous currency.

The current spin that passes my twitter timeline is that it is state independent. Technically it is, but the sense it conveys is 'out of the reach of governments'. (c.f. "Prince Ibn so-and-so should have put his money is bitcoins. haha".)

It is always helpful to take the old history books out of the dusty shelves and read up on e.g. The Opium Wars to have a 'better' understanding on the er 'softer' aspects of "money".



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: