No, in the same way that court decisions based on witness testimony are not.
It is, of course, difficult for outside parties to verify the reporting, but journalism has never been legally bound to the standards appropriate to scientific research where reproducibility is key.
> It baffles me that no fact checking/ benchmarking exists for such a major news platform.
The absence of named sources does not imply the absence of fact checking.
>It is, of course, difficult for outside parties to verify the reporting, but journalism has never been legally bound to the standards appropriate to scientific research where reproducibility is key
What about when false information could cause financial harm?
It is ironic considering that BBG( Bloomberg is private )
Why wouldn’t it be?
> Is this not speculation?
No, in the same way that court decisions based on witness testimony are not.
It is, of course, difficult for outside parties to verify the reporting, but journalism has never been legally bound to the standards appropriate to scientific research where reproducibility is key.
> It baffles me that no fact checking/ benchmarking exists for such a major news platform.
The absence of named sources does not imply the absence of fact checking.