Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think all comments so far have missed the point. So called "net neutrality" is really just a big government handout to Google, Facebook, Amazon and others who want a free ride on the infrastructure built over decades by private company investments of billions of dollars. Putting a chokehold on the telcos has made it so these large companies don't have to make similar investments and put large infrastructure assets on their balance sheets that would depress their stock prices dramatically. If Google, FB, etc. want a free rider internet, they can go pay for it themselves. All of these companies have enough cash on hand to make the investment right now if they wanted to -- it would just make the billionaire ceos a lot less wealthy. I'm surprised nobody has pointed this out yet.


Repealing net neutrality helps FANG. They can afford to pay the consumer ISPs rent-seeking. Nascent competitors can't.

That's the future - where Comcast customers get enough bandwidth to stream 360p videos only from sites that pay Comcast for the privilege.


You have it backwards. These companies can benefit financially from the repeal. But that's short-sighted, and they know it. Innovation will suffer without Net Neutrality, and these companies are more worried about that long-tail loss than any short-term windfall that this would cause.


I pay for a certain download/upload speed. Why does it matter where it comes from?


Because,

1. The companies you mention also have a monopoly on internet content distribution

2. Most people are herd thinkers, don't know anything about NN, only that "it's bad" because the content they see says "it's bad"

Propaganda works.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: