I think there is a lot of "it depends" in here. If deployment is zero friction to the customer then maybe this applies. If deployment by customer is disrupting then forcing them to go through multiple release cycles due to bugs or lack of required features can be worse for them.

I just lived with a half-broken product for a year rather than deploy the more final full featured but less stable version multiple times from a vendor due to such deployment difficulty. I want quality and completeness over speed in that case.