Do you have any specifics in how the article doesn't meet your standards or which aspects were poorly communicated?
My decently informed layman's understanding [1] led me to believe this article was a very well written description of some fascinating developments. As of now, I want to read more articles like it.
To be fair, I may be representative of a smaller niche. I agree that many laypeople might struggle with the technical parts.
However, I would love to know specifically how I may be mistaken in what I am taking away from these articles, if anything.
[1] I majored in math and am an avid follower of physics and cosmology.
My decently informed layman's understanding [1] led me to believe this article was a very well written description of some fascinating developments. As of now, I want to read more articles like it.
To be fair, I may be representative of a smaller niche. I agree that many laypeople might struggle with the technical parts.
However, I would love to know specifically how I may be mistaken in what I am taking away from these articles, if anything.
[1] I majored in math and am an avid follower of physics and cosmology.