Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is not good, the info density for the screen area is too low. This could have been one maybe two screens worth. Is this the credits to Friends? Am I consuming Lisp Content while chillin in my penthouse on my 20k couch using a gold plated IPad X Tablet?

Millennials are Killing Common Lisp.

one page, https://www.rust-lang.org/en-US/



Counterpoint: I think the Common Lisp page does a good job giving good examples of interesting features, leaving me curious for more. The web benchmark is intriguing [1], and i'm really happy they gave an example of a good IDE, which so many language presentations completely overlook. The tooling is what I, as a developer, will interact with daily! I don't care if you language can do fizzwabble if I can't make heads or tails of it!

The Rust page, on the other hand, only effectively demonstrates one feature, which i don't care about. Unicode strings? Woo. Those belong in separate i18n file. It does so in a box that doesn't even properly display the whole snippet without scrolling. It is cool that I'm able to run it, though of course a newbie like me wouldn't know what to do. Its list of features should be links to examples. As is, the bullet points could have been extracted from a powerpoint presentation and are just as mind-numbing.

[1] though I want a link to more information, for example which servers they chose for Ruby and Node. Were those best-in-class for their language? I'm very suspicious of benchmarks given with little context.


I should have been clear, I am only critiquing the presentation, not the content. The content is stellar.


I can see how it can be annoying to have to scroll to see everything. That said, I also find the page somewhat pretty.

I suspect preconceptions of the language going into the page make a big difference.

Which is not to criticize the Rust page. It is also nice, just different.

I will offer that proclaiming that Millenials are Killing Common Lisp is probably more effective at alienating potential users than a redesigned home page. :(


We are also in the process of redesigning our home page, (and the website generally) due to its flaws.


The Racket-Lang site almost had it perfect:

http://racket-lang.org/

The stuff above the language description should be shoved to the bottom (excluding obviously the top menu) and it would be perfect. I miss their old site because it was obvious and to the point and had examples right away.


This is good, https://web.archive.org/web/20150317023049/http://racket-lan...

I didn't get RSI scrolling through expansive material space.


Huh? If I exclude completely uninteresting "Racket School 2018" announcement, I have 18 words (plus some pointless images) on the first screen.

Oh, apparently I'm supposed to hover over the images to see more text. Why?!


I mean exclude those too and the page looks much better.


Exactly this. "Fluff" for something that does not lack an online documentation experience.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: