What exactly is the point of this article? Despite its title it feels neither modest, nor like a good-faith attempt of a proposal. It more feels like a cheap snipe against the standards group, regurgitating the same tired points. Does anyone really believe that anything productive comes out of this?
No, but perhaps if people keep regurgitating these same tired points, compiler developers will get bored of listening, and start to do something different.
What is outrageous about this argument, which has been going on for far too long, is how people who don't get C or don't use it, keep dismissing critiques from expert practitioners like DJB or Torvalds and from academics like Regehr as if those people are all to damn stupid to understand the issues.
