For starters do you really think that after 50 years of nuclear weapons program and military spending on a scale never before imagined even by industrial civilization we REALLY missed some way to make better (smaller, lighter, etc.) nuclear weapons? Because when you believe cold fusion exists this is fundamentally what are stating.
Fenymann path integration, and its QCD and QED evolution have been some of the most successful mathematical theories ever developed. We can model fusion interactions incredibly well, this math lets up predict things like the Higgs Boson.
You can't even get papers published as "Cold Fusion" any more (in a respectable journal) because the scientific community gave up on. The math doesn't check out. Now those truly dedicated pants on head tenured professors who continue to feed this non-scientific pursuit publish under the title of "low-energy nuclear reactions" and "condensed matter nuclear science" since some trash-tier journals still accept that.
The problem is nothing cold/low energy to fusion. Over coming the EM "barrier" to hit the nucili to _maybe_ trigger fusion requires MeV of energy. That doesn't come from "cold" objects.
The closest man kind has gotten is Muon-Catalyzed Fusion which required cosmic rays hitting the upper atmosphere as a source of high-energy particles. And it was already considered nonviable by 1957 [1]
For starters do you really think that after 50 years of nuclear weapons program and military spending on a scale never before imagined even by industrial civilization we REALLY missed some way to make better (smaller, lighter, etc.) nuclear weapons? Because when you believe cold fusion exists this is fundamentally what are stating.
Fenymann path integration, and its QCD and QED evolution have been some of the most successful mathematical theories ever developed. We can model fusion interactions incredibly well, this math lets up predict things like the Higgs Boson.
You can't even get papers published as "Cold Fusion" any more (in a respectable journal) because the scientific community gave up on. The math doesn't check out. Now those truly dedicated pants on head tenured professors who continue to feed this non-scientific pursuit publish under the title of "low-energy nuclear reactions" and "condensed matter nuclear science" since some trash-tier journals still accept that.
The problem is nothing cold/low energy to fusion. Over coming the EM "barrier" to hit the nucili to _maybe_ trigger fusion requires MeV of energy. That doesn't come from "cold" objects.
The closest man kind has gotten is Muon-Catalyzed Fusion which required cosmic rays hitting the upper atmosphere as a source of high-energy particles. And it was already considered nonviable by 1957 [1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion