> First, the author of the article has no professional credibility in either chess or machine learning. He's a professor of math and a writer. No disrespect to either math or writing, I love and value both very highly, but they have very little to do with chess and machine learning per se.
Well, do you accept Garry Kasparov qualified to comment on this?
"I admit that I was pleased to see that AlphaZero had a dynamic, open style like my own."
"Alpha-Zero is surpassing us in a profound and useful way, a model that may be duplicated on any other task or field where virtual knowledge can be generated."
Well, do you accept Garry Kasparov qualified to comment on this?
"I admit that I was pleased to see that AlphaZero had a dynamic, open style like my own."
"Alpha-Zero is surpassing us in a profound and useful way, a model that may be duplicated on any other task or field where virtual knowledge can be generated."
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6419/1087