As far as I remember, for every features of Facebook, like private messages, sharing pictures and status, etc, there is at least one alternative, and people are free to move to several competitors. There is no technical reason to force the Facebook company to change their products, but they might have an obligation to educate people about the usages of its website.
You need strong proof to claim "Facebook has become the most dangerous online company". Recently, Facebook groups were used to organize the yellow vests movement in France. For non-techies, Facebook does provide a new way to communicate.
You could always argue "oh yeah, but it already existed 15 years ago with X", but Facebook made it available to the masses.
The security/social concerns happening recently create new opportunities for Facebook's competition, so I wouldn't be that alarmed.
You need strong proof to claim "Facebook has become the most dangerous online company". Recently, Facebook groups were used to organize the yellow vests movement in France. For non-techies, Facebook does provide a new way to communicate.
You could always argue "oh yeah, but it already existed 15 years ago with X", but Facebook made it available to the masses.
The security/social concerns happening recently create new opportunities for Facebook's competition, so I wouldn't be that alarmed.
Google, on the other hand...