Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I understood it to be a fee for static IP binding, used or reserved. Sad to be corrected (I mean, happy to be corrected but the news won't be happy)


You are incorrect. They are going to begin charging a small fee for public IPs (i.e. IPs that can talk to the internet), not static IPs. They do support NAT as an alternative, but they charge for it (and are slightly lowering that cost as a part of this change).

To be clear, none of this is going to have any measurable impact on me, I'm just pointing out the fact that they didn't really hold true to the promise of the free tier.

Source: the email that they sent out to customers about this


Well that's bad. Thanks for clarifying and you were right from the start.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: