Well, I'm just pointing out that "easy" is not something that can be attributed to a programming language based on cute, pseudo-code like samples online.
You don't see "Python is easy" examples with full test suite attached to them, explaining that, well, you are in for a ride without those.
As for your comment: I can believe that production breaking typos may have been at a similar level. I don't believe that the effort to reach that level was the same, though.
You don't see "Python is easy" examples with full test suite attached to them, explaining that, well, you are in for a ride without those.
As for your comment: I can believe that production breaking typos may have been at a similar level. I don't believe that the effort to reach that level was the same, though.